Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/129824
Authors: 
Quercia, Simone
Year of Publication: 
2015
Series/Report no.: 
CeDEx Discussion Paper Series 2015-09
Abstract: 
Betrayal aversion has been operationalized as the evidence that subjects demand a higher risk premium to take social risks compared to natural risks. This evidence has been first shown by Bohnet and Zeckhauser (2004) using an adaptation of the Becker-DeGroot-Marshak mechanism (BDM, Becker et al. (1964)). We compare their implementation of the BDM mechanism with a new version designed to facilitate subjects' comprehension. We find that, although the two versions produce different distributions of values, the size of betrayal aversion, measured as an average treatment difference between social and natural risk settings, is not different across the two versions. We further show that our implementation is preferable to use in practice as it reduces substantially subjects' mistakes and hence the likelihood of noisy valuations.
Subjects: 
experiments
betrayal aversion
trust game
Becker-DeGroot-Marshak mechanism
preference elicitation
JEL: 
C90
D81
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
754.71 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.