Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/128777 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2004
Schriftenreihe/Nr.: 
WIFO Working Papers No. 240
Verlag: 
Austrian Institute of Economic Research (WIFO), Vienna
Zusammenfassung: 
There are large differences between Steindl's ideas on growth policies and the Brussels/Paris consensus. Steindl called for innovation and education policies, the mainstream today rather favours deregulation and privatisation. Steindl stressed the positive demand-side effects of the public sector and the contribution of lower household savings and anti-cyclical policies to growth. The economic mainstream praises the efficiency effects of a declining public sector, the importance of high savings for investment and warns of active anti-cyclical policies being an impediment to budget consolidation. Steindl and the Keynesians regarded the labour market situation as a consequence of economic growth. Today many economists see low growth as a result of labour market rigidities.
Dokumentart: 
Working Paper

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
170.32 kB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.