Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Lohse, Johannes
Year of Publication: 
Series/Report no.: 
Discussion Paper Series, University of Heidelberg, Department of Economics 578
In three different variants of an one-shot public good game I analyze the relationship between cooperation and cognitive abilities, assessed through the cognitive reflection test (CRT). In a between-subjects design, the baseline case is contrasted with two treatment conditions that allow to control for two potentially moderating factors: By employing a test for the presence of confusion, the first condition scrutinizes whether higher cognitive abilities are correlated with cooperation proper or simply grant a better understanding of the incentive structure. The second condition explores the proposition that the link between cognitive abilities and cooperation could depend on the complexity of the decision situation. To exogenously create a cognitively more demanding choice setting, subjects had to decide under time pressure. I find a strong and positive relationship between CRT-scores and cooperation, that is not driven by confusion. Time pressure has a strongly moderating effect on this relationship.
Cognitive Abilities
Public Goods
Dual Process Theories
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
471.62 kB

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.