Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/126671
Authors: 
Hartog, Joop
Raposo, Pedro
Year of Publication: 
2015
Series/Report no.: 
IZA Discussion Papers 9578
Abstract: 
In the model of Harris and Holmstrom (1982) workers pay an insurance premium to prevent a wage decline. As employers are unable to assess the ability of a labour market entrant, they would offer a wage equal to expected productivity of the worker's category and adjust it with unfolding information on true individual productivity. Workers are willing to accept a reduction in starting wage to prevent a reduction in their wage when their productivity is revealed to be below the expected value for their category. While Harris and Holmstrom indicate crystal clear how the prediction can be tested, their prescription has never been applied. Using Portuguese data covering virtually the entire labour force, we find that the prediction is unequivocally rejected. We interpret the results instead as confirmation of earlier results showing that workers are compensated for the financial risk of investing in an education.
Subjects: 
risk premium
starting wages
unknown productivity
wage rigidity
JEL: 
J31
D86
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
2.36 MB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.