Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/126155
Authors: 
Berger, Melissa
Heinemann, Friedrich
Year of Publication: 
2016
Series/Report no.: 
ZEW policy brief 1/2016
Abstract: 
The experiences of the ongoing refugee crisis in Europe highlight the failures of the current model of having the EU and its members states share responsibility for asylum policies. Based on standard criteria of fiscal federalism, this paper analyses the shortcomings of the status quo. We show that European asylum policies stand in sharp contradiction to the optimal assignment of tasks within a federal system. For example, the current system creates substantial incentives for free-riding and foregoes the potential benefits of European economies of scale. Given this diagnosis, we explore the pros and cons of different options for a more European approach. In particular, we analyze and provide estimates of the quantitative implications for the options of: (A) quotas that would distribute refugees across countries according to a pre-determined calculation of reception capacity; (B) EU financing of national service provision; and (C) EU service provision in asylum policies.
Document Type: 
Research Report

Files in This Item:
File
Size
294.28 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.