Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/125121
Authors: 
Koudstaal, Martin
Sloof, Randolph
van Praag, Mirjam
Year of Publication: 
2015
Series/Report no.: 
Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper 15-124/VII
Abstract: 
Empirical evidence supports the conventional wisdom that entrepreneurs are more optimistic and overconfident than others. However, the same holds true for top managers. In this lab-in-the-field experiment we directly compare the scores of entrepreneurs, managers and employees on a comprehensive set of measures of optimism and overconfidence (n = 2,058). The results show that on average entrepreneurs are more optimistic than others in their dispositional optimism and attributional style when bad events occur. For incentivized measures of overconfidence we find no difference between entrepreneurs and managers, although both are more prone to it than employees. Finally, exploration of within-group heterogeneities shows that optimism and success are more strongly related for managers than for entrepreneurs and that an average entrepreneur is not more optimistic than successful managers. We conclude that optimism and overconfidence are indeed characteristics of entrepreneurs, but they are not unique when compared to (top) managers.
Subjects: 
Entrepreneurs
managers
dispositional optimism
attributional style
overestimation
overconfidence
behavioral economics
JEL: 
L26
C93
D03
M13
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
893.21 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.