Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/123396 
Year of Publication: 
2009
Series/Report no.: 
WWZ Discussion Paper No. 01/09
Publisher: 
University of Basel, Center of Business and Economics (WWZ), Basel
Abstract: 
This paper empirically examines the impact of temporary agency work on firm performance using panel data from German establishments. Thereby, special attention is devoted to the question, whether there are performance differences between firms using temporary agency workers (TAWs) as a buffer stock (flexibility strategy) and firms using TAWs for screening purposes (screening strategy). While the theoretical discussion on this issue does not lead to clear-cut results, our empirical investigation provides the following results. First, we find an inverse U-shaped relationship between the share of TAWs and firm performance. Second, we obtain that firms following the screening strategy are significantly more productive than firms following the flexibility strategy. These results are found to be valid in both cross-sectional and panel data settings, so they are robust to unobserved firm heterogeneity.
Subjects: 
Temporary agency work
firm performance
flexibility strategy
screening strategy
JEL: 
C23
J24
J42
J82
M55
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
868.08 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.