Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/121906
Authors: 
Rodriguez Lopez, Miguel
do Nascimento, Daniele Vieira
Garcia Sanchez, Daniela
Bolivar Lobato, Martha
Year of Publication: 
2015
Series/Report no.: 
GIGA Working Papers 278
Abstract: 
This article addresses the question of how Brazil, Costa Rica, and Colombia came to decide on their climate change mitigation strategies, which are based on market-oriented policies. The analysis compares Brazilian bioethanol, Costa Rican renewable energy, and Colombia's clean development mechanism. Using the 'chicken game,' the best response is to 'disable the steering wheel.' This means that an actor reduces his or her capacity for action in order to signal a commitment to continue acting in line with his or her past behaviour. The study assesses this strategy at the level of relationships between national and international actors. The findings show that the national actors examined here are either continuing with criticised projects, in the Brazilian case, or slowing down their mitigating strategies, in the cases of Costa Rica and Colombia, and thereby restricting their capacity for action in order to reach a better negotiating position.
Subjects: 
climate change
mitigation
bioethanol
energy
carbon markets
Brazil
Costa Rica
Colombia
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
565.48 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.