Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/119115
Authors: 
Schmitt, Peter
Year of Publication: 
2010
Series/Report no.: 
50th Congress of the European Regional Science Association: "Sustainable Regional Growth and Development in the Creative Knowledge Economy", 19-23 August 2010, Jönköping, Sweden
Abstract: 
Polycentricity is one of the key words coined by the ESDP in 1999 to frame strategic planning at the transnational level. In recent years, however, the concept of polycentricity (and its inherent expectations) has increasingly trickled down as well to the regional level. The paper stems from observations and findings gained from assisting, advising and moderating an international expert group that consists of planners coming from a dozen of European metropolitan areas. Within this group the objective has been to identify major challenges, to reflect current methods, routines and debates and to share lessons and experiences with regard to the applicability and implementation of the concept of polycentricty in their respective metropolitan area. Using text analysis as well as participating observation, the paper will derive a typology of different analytical and normative understandings of polycentricity at the regional level. By exploring three thematic strands that have been chosen by the group to further discuss the potential performance of the concept of polycentricity (here: a: metropolitan governance and the implementation of plans and policies, b: urban sprawl and climate change response, c: functional labour division between centres and economic competitiveness/resilience), the paper will reflect similarities and differences of the planners' rationales and expectations, their current practices and activities and their experiences (so far) that are closely connected to the application of polycentricity within European metropolitan areas. The paper will also illustrate the high degree of context sensitivity to which the concept of polycentricity has to respond to in each of the twelve metropolitan areas that have been examined.
Document Type: 
Conference Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.