Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/115351 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2015
Schriftenreihe/Nr.: 
ADBI Working Paper No. 532
Verlag: 
Asian Development Bank Institute (ADBI), Tokyo
Zusammenfassung: 
This paper compares three methods of analyzing exchange rate regimes in East Asia: static analysis, conventional dynamic analysis, and dynamic transition analysis. First we provide quantitative results that both estimated parameters for Thailand and time intervals are applied symmetrically across the three approaches. Our comparable simulation results illustrate how these three analyses are mutually related. Comparisons across the three methods demonstrate limitations of the static and conventional dynamic analyses where exchange rate regimes remain unchanged over the analysis horizon. Moreover, we emphasize three advantages of the dynamic transition analysis over the static and conventional dynamic analyses in that shifts from the current regime to alternative regimes are contrasted with a benchmark case of maintaining the current regime over the analysis horizon.
Schlagwörter: 
exchange rate regimes
dynamic transition analysis
capital account management
exchange rate stability
JEL: 
F33
F41
F42
Dokumentart: 
Working Paper

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
816.08 kB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.