Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/114057
Autoren: 
Clark, Andrew E.
Senik, Claudia
Yamada, Katsunori
Datum: 
2015
Reihe/Nr.: 
IZA Discussion Papers 9189
Zusammenfassung: 
While there is now something of a consensus in the literature on the economics of happiness that income comparisons to others help determine subjective wellbeing, debate continues over the relative importance of own and reference-group income, in particular in research on the Easterlin paradox. The variety of results in this domain have produced some scepticism regarding happiness analysis, and in particular with respect to the measurement of reference-group income. We here use data from an original Internet survey in Japan to compare the results from happiness regressions to those from hypothetical-choice experiments. The trade-off between own and others' income (showing the importance of absolute and relative income) is similar in these two sets of results. This kind of validation of experienced utility via direct comparison with decision utility remains rare in this literature.
Schlagwörter: 
satisfaction
income comparisons
reference-group income
discrete-choice experiments
JEL: 
D31
D63
I3
J31
Dokumentart: 
Working Paper

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
325.32 kB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.