Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/113995
Authors: 
Veldboer, Lex
Kleinhans, Reinout
van Ham, Maarten
Year of Publication: 
2015
Series/Report no.: 
IZA Discussion Papers 9111
Abstract: 
Modern welfare policies are increasingly based on notions of reciprocity. Citizens on welfare benefits have to do something in return, e.g. volunteer work. Notwithstanding general public support, social philosophers have been critical on 'mandatory' activities in community programmes. So far, the participants themselves have scarcely been asked about the (un)fairness of 'mandatory volunteering'. This small exploratory study aims to reveal the perceptions of female participants in mandatory volunteering programmes and to formulate directions for further research. We analyse how in Rotterdam the transition from labour market re-integration policies to a mandatory reciprocity approach is viewed by long-term unemployed women who were already volunteering. Surprisingly, they claim that the new approach better recognises their contribution to 'society'. They also view the policy as necessary and fair to other benefit claimants who are perceived to lack any motivation to give something back to society. An agenda for further research is presented.
Subjects: 
social justice
welfare policies
gender
unemployment
reciprocity
volunteering
social benefits
austerity
Rotterdam
JEL: 
J24
J28
J64
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
166.84 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.