Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/113863 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2013
Quellenangabe: 
[Journal:] Revista de Métodos Cuantitativos para la Economía y la Empresa [ISSN:] 1886-516X [Volume:] 16 [Publisher:] Universidad Pablo de Olavide [Place:] Sevilla [Year:] 2013 [Pages:] 95-120
Verlag: 
Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Sevilla
Zusammenfassung (übersetzt): 
A comparative analysis between three measurement models (with formative, reflective, and antecedents approach) has been conducted to measure the dimensions of the teaching service quality. Previously valid and reliable instruments have been designed to measure the service quality and related constructs. An exploratory study has been performed to obtain content validity. Additionally, both exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis (EFA and CFA, respectively) have been conducted to obtain the appropriate dimensional structure and relevant items. Using structural equations modeling (MEC) has been found that the antecedent model, although it has the same predictive power, has better fit indices than reflective and formative models.
Schlagwörter: 
teaching service quality
perceived value
student satisfaction
behavioral intentions
structural models
formative and reflective approach
JEL: 
M39
I23
Creative-Commons-Lizenz: 
cc-by-sa Logo
Dokumentart: 
Article

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
947.32 kB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.