Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/113696
Authors: 
Beigi, Maryam H. A.
Budzinski, Oliver
Year of Publication: 
2013
Citation: 
[Journal:] Intereconomics [ISSN:] 1613-964X [Publisher:] Springer [Place:] Heidelberg [Volume:] 48 [Year:] 2013 [Issue:] 3 [Pages:] 174-179
Abstract: 
Event studies represent an increasingly popular method to evaluate the welfare effects of economic policy decisions. The basic idea is that stock market reactions to the announcement of policy decisions contain superior information about the welfare effects of these decisions. This paper investigates the degree of reliability of event studies as a policy evaluation method by critically reflecting upon two underlying assumptions. Since both the information superiority of financial markets and the determination of economic welfare effects based on abnormal returns consist of considerable interpretation problems, we issue a note of caution: scientists and policy makers should be very reluctant to rely on stock market reactions as a referee on economic policy decisions. Event studies cannot replace thorough theoretical economic analysis.
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Document Type: 
Article

Files in This Item:
File
Size
174.83 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.