Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/113151
Authors: 
Lohse, Johannes
Year of Publication: 
2015
Series/Report no.: 
Beiträge zur Jahrestagung des Vereins für Socialpolitik 2015: Ökonomische Entwicklung - Theorie und Politik - Session: Public Good Contributions D14-V1
Abstract: 
Will individuals contribute to a public good, even if doing so imposes a negative externality on an outsider? This paper describes the results of an experiment in which decision makers could contribute to a real public good, while (part of) the contribution costs were passed on to another participant. Decision makers with social preferences thus faced lower contribution cost but had to take into account additional costs imposed on an outsider. Such trade-offs are pervasive in many public good decisions, in which those who decide about provision, those who finance provision and those who benefit from it are different actors. My findings suggest that decision makers, at large, ignored adverse effects imposed on another participant. When varying both the distribution of initial endowments and the fraction of costs passed on to the outsider, I find that decision makers only refrain from contributing if the outsider has to pay for a disproportionate share or the full provision costs. This finding is best explained by advantageous inequity aversion.
JEL: 
H41
C92
H23
Document Type: 
Conference Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.