Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Chang, Chia-Lin
McAleer, Michael
Year of Publication: 
Series/Report no.: 
Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper 15-044/III
Virtually all rankings of journals are based on citations, including self citations by journals and individual academics. The gold standard for bibliometric rankings based on citations data is the widely-used Thomson Reuters Web of Science (2014) citations database, which publishes, among others, the celebrated Impact Factor. However, there are numerous bibliometric measures, also known as research assessment measures, based on the Thomson Reuters citations database, but they do not all seem to have been collected in a single source. The purpose of this paper is to present, define and compare the 16 most well-known Thomson Reuters bibliometric measures in a single source. It is important that the existing bibliometric measures be presented in any rankings papers as alternative bibliometric measures based on the Thomson Reuters citations database can and do produce different rankings, as has been documented in a number of papers in the bibliometrics literature.
Research assessment measures
Impact factors
Bibliometric measures
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
143.23 kB

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.