Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/110775
Authors: 
Hauk, Esther
Ortega, Javier
Year of Publication: 
2015
Series/Report no.: 
IZA Discussion Papers 9048
Abstract: 
We model a two-region country where value is created through bilateral production between masses and elites (bourgeois and landowners). Industrialization requires the elites to finance schools and the masses to attend them. Schooling raises productivity, particularly for matches between masses and bourgeois. At the same time, only country-wide education ("unified schooling") renders the masses mobile across regions. Alternatively, schools can be implemented in one region alone ("regional education") or the regionally dominant group can choose to implement schooling in its own region but refuse to share the costs/proceeds within the wider country-level group ("secession"). We show that schools are more likely to be set-up when the bourgeoisie dominates, but that this is not necessarily socially efficient. Unified schooling is always chosen if the identity of the dominant elite at the regional and country level is the same and/or the industrialization shock is sufficiently high. If instead the bourgeoisie is dominant in one region and landowners are dominant countrywise, the bourgeoisie of that region may promote the secession of the region, and this can be socially efficient. The model is shown to be consistent with evidence for 19th century France and Spain.
Subjects: 
nation-building
education
industrialization
JEL: 
D02
I2
N00
O14
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
667.02 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.