Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Bonini, Nicolao
Pighin, Stefania
Rettore, Enrico
Savadori, Lucia
Schena, Federico
Tonini, Sara
Tosi, Paolo
Year of Publication: 
Series/Report no.: 
IZA Discussion Papers 9009
Overconfidence is a well-established bias in which someone's subjective confidence in their own judgments is systematically greater than their objective accuracy. There is abundant anecdotal evidence that overconfident people increase their exposure to risk. In this paper, we test whether overconfident people underestimate the probability of incurring an avalanche accident. An avalanche accident is a typical "black swan" event because it has a low probability of occurring but has potential dramatic consequences. To test whether the overconfidence bias affects the decision of backcountry skiers to go on a ski trip under different levels of avalanche risk, we measured individual cognitive traits and then used a random effect logit model to measure their effects on the probability to take the tour, by controlling for other observable characteristics of the respondent. We show that 1) overconfidence is widespread even in our sample and 2) practitioners who are more prone to overestimate their knowledge are also more likely to take the risk associated with a ski trip exposed to avalanche danger. This suggests that overconfident people are more exposed to black swan events.
cognitive bias
risky decision
backcountry skiing
measurement errors
logit model
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
699.79 kB

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.