Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/108222 
Authors: 
Year of Publication: 
2011
Series/Report no.: 
IEHAS Discussion Papers No. MT-DP - 2011/15
Publisher: 
Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Economics, Budapest
Abstract: 
The paper analyzes a political accountability game with an electorate of 'partisan' and 'independent' voters. It is shown that politicians have a strategic incentive to engage in 'divisive politics', that is, to force some independent voters to take sides, even if the direct electoral benefits are higher for their opponents than for themselves. By polarizing the electorate, the incumbent politician weakens the ability of independent voters to make him accountable for his policies in the common interest. Moreover, the interests of the incumbent and the opposition are aligned: the opposition also benefits from divisive politics because, in equilibrium, its election probability increases.
Subjects: 
political accountability
political agency
divisive politics
democracy in divided societies
JEL: 
D72
ISBN: 
978-615-5024-49-8
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
527.78 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.