Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/107867
Authors: 
Dijkgraaf, Elbert
Gradus, Raymond
Year of Publication: 
2014
Series/Report no.: 
Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper 14-155/VI
Abstract: 
The EU advocates a household waste recycling rate of more than 70%. Although the Netherlands already years ago invested in recycling policies heavily, this is still a large challenge as nowadays on average this rate is approximately 50% and nearly no municipalities have a rate above 70%. Given the experience, it is possible to learn from the Dutch experience which policies are effective in increasing the recycling rates. Based on a large panel data set for the Netherlands , we show that unit-based pricing, avoiding a duo-bin or unsorted and compostable waste, and moving back the frequency of collecting unsorted and compostable waste at the curbside are effective in raising the recycling rate. However, only unit-based pricing has a substantial effect. In nearly all cases changing the frequency of collection of recyclables had no or very small effects. We find some evidence for the effectiveness of adding bring locations to curbside collection. Based on an estimation of the cost function most policies have no effect on costs, except for unit-based pricing (saving on cost) and increases in the frequency of unsorted waste collection (cost increasing). Overall, it seems nearly impossible to reach the EU-goal of 70% with the policies applied.
Subjects: 
Recycling
waste policy
recycling
local government
Netherlands
JEL: 
Q18
Q38
R11
R15
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
335.79 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.