Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Huttunen, Kristiina
Moen, Jarle
Salvanes, Kjell G.
Year of Publication: 
Series/Report no.: 
IZA Discussion Papers 8780
It is well documented that displaced workers suffer severe earnings losses, but not why this is so. One reason may be that workers are unable or unwilling to move to regions with better employment opportunities. We study this and find that job displacement increases regional mobility but, surprisingly, we also find that displaced workers who move suffer larger income losses than displaced workers who stay in the same region. This is not a selection effect, but reflects the fact that non-economic factors such as family ties are very important for the decision to migrate. Workers are less likely to move if they have family in the region where they already live, and job loss stimulates workers to relocate with parents and siblings when they live in different regions. Looking at earnings we find that the entire post displacement income difference between displaced movers and stayers is driven by workers moving to regions where their parents live or to rural areas. Furthermore, when looking at long-run family income, we find that the difference between displaced movers and stayers is very modest. With respect to selection, we find that migrants are positively selected on average, but very heterogeneous. They seem to be drawn disproportionately both from the high and the low end of the skill distribution in the region they leave.
plant closures
regional mobility
family ties
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
1.05 MB

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.