Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/106785
Authors: 
Alcidi, Cinzia
Gros, Daniel
Giovannini, Alessandro
Vogel, Lukas
Belke, Ansgar
Callan, Tim
Keane, Claire
Savage, Michael
Walsh, John R.
Colgan, Brian
Year of Publication: 
2014
Citation: 
[Journal:] Intereconomics [ISSN:] 1613-964X [Publisher:] Springer [Place:] Heidelberg [Volume:] 49 [Year:] 2014 [Issue:] 6 [Pages:] 300-322
Abstract: 
Vigorous debate over the effectiveness of the fiscal adjustment programmes for the crisis-stricken countries in the eurozone has grown quite polarised. In this Forum, several experts use analytical, evidence-based approaches to gauge the effectiveness of these programmes. The role played by the estimates of the fi scal multipliers that the Commission, IMF and ECB used to structure the adjustment programmes is crucial to this debate. If these multipliers were underestimated, as the IMF itself claims, then the negative impact of the fiscal restructuring on already fragile economies would also have been underestimated. Several authors examine the available evidence to determine whether the adjustments programmes were flawed from the outset. Another contribution analyses the effectiveness of structural reforms when monetary policy rates are near the zero lower bound. A final paper uses a case study of Ireland's recovery thus far to examine the actual effects that the programmes have had on the crisis-stricken countries' economies.
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Document Type: 
Article

Files in This Item:
File
Size
353.19 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.