Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/106482
Authors: 
Schwirplies, Claudia
Ziegler, Andreas
Year of Publication: 
2015
Series/Report no.: 
Joint Discussion Paper Series in Economics 04-2015
Abstract: 
This paper contributes to the economic literature on pure and impure public goods by considering two alternatives for contributing to the public good climate protection: compensating carbon emissions from conventional consumption or paying higher prices for climate-friendly products. We analytically and empirically examine a wide range of motives and their impact on individuals' choice in favor of these two alternatives. Relying on data from representative surveys among more than 2000 participants from Germany and the USA, our results indicate that environmental awareness, warm glow motives, and the desire to set a good example significantly motivate the choice of both climate protection activities in both countries. However, some motives differ considerably between both alternatives and countries. A green identity enhances the willingness to pay a price premium for climate-friendly goods or services in Germany, while social norms seem to be of much higher relevance in the USA. Our results further suggest that the choice of climate protection activities, especially of carbon offsetting, entails a high degree of uncertainty.
Subjects: 
Public good
climate change
climate protection
carbon offsetting
price premium
JEL: 
H41
Q54
Q58
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
138.55 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.