Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/105108
Autoren: 
Becker, Raphael N.
Hillman, Arye L.
Potrafke, Niklas
Schwemmer, Alexander H.
Datum: 
2014
Reihe/Nr.: 
CESifo Working Paper 5034
Zusammenfassung: 
We compiled data on all United Nations General Assembly resolutions on which voting took place between January 1990 and June 2013 and find a preoccupation with one country: in 65 percent of instances in which a country is criticized in a resolution, the country is Israel, with no other country criticized in more than 10 percent of resolutions. We use comparative quantitative criteria to confirm that Israel is subject to discrimination. To explain the motives for discrimination, we present a model of behavioral political economy that includes decoy voting, vanity of autocrats, and a Schelling focal point for deflection of criticism. The model includes a role for traditional prejudice. Our conclusions more generally concern political culture in the United Nations.
Schlagwörter: 
United Nations General Assembly voting
expressive voting
decoy voting
focal point
logrolling
discrimination
prejudice
political culture
JEL: 
Z12
Dokumentart: 
Working Paper

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
374.41 kB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.