Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/104275
Authors: 
Drometer, Marcus
Rincke, Johannes
Year of Publication: 
2008
Series/Report no.: 
Munich Discussion Paper 2008-7
Abstract: 
Measuring the effect of ballot access restrictions on electoral competition is complicated because the stringency of ballot access regulations cannot be treated as being exogenous to candidates' entry decisions. This paper exploits the 1968 U.S. Supreme Court decision to strike down Ohio's ballot access laws as a natural experiment to overcome the endogeneity problem. The evidence from difference-in-difference estimations suggests that the court decision and the accompanying sharp decrease in Ohio's petition requirements resulted in major parties facing a signifcant increase in competition from third party and independent candidates.
Subjects: 
Ballot access
Petition requirements
Electoral competition
Natural experiment
JEL: 
D72
D78
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.