Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Wolf, Joachim
Rosenberg, Timo
Year of Publication: 
[Journal:] BuR - Business Research [ISSN:] 1866-8658 [Volume:] 5 [Year:] 2012 [Issue:] 2 [Pages:] 178-196
This paper discusses a number of avenues management scholars could follow to reduce the existing gap between scientific rigor and practical relevance without relativizing the importance of the first goal dimension. Such changes are necessary because many management studies do not fully exploit the possibilities to increase their practical relevance while maintaining scientific rigor. We argue that this rigor-relevance gap is not only the consequence of the currently prevailing institutional context in the scientific system, but that individual scholars can reduce the gap between rigorous and practically relevant research by modifying their research work. Thus, most of our suggestions refer to individual scholars’ research activities and relate to specific steps in the (empirical) research process. Our discussion does not imply that all management studies should be practically oriented; basic research will remain a very important part of management research. However, we believe that not enough management research studies are significantly influenced by practical relevance.
practical relevance
empirical research
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Document Type: 

Files in This Item:
392.55 kB

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.