Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/103425
Authors: 
Vieider, Ferdinand M.
Beyene, Abebe
Bluffstone, Randall
Dissanayake, Sahan
Gebreegziabher, Zenebe
Martinsson, Peter
Mekonnen, Alemu
Year of Publication: 
2014
Series/Report no.: 
WZB Discussion Paper SP II 2014-401
Abstract: 
Risk aversion has generally been found to decrease in income or wealth. This may lead one to expect that poor countries will be more risk averse than rich countries. Recent comparative findings with students, however, suggest the opposite, giving rise to a riskincome paradox. We test this paradox by measuring the risk preferences of over 500 household heads spread over the highlands of Ethiopia. We do so using certainty equivalents, which have rarely been used in developing countries, but permit us to relate the findings to a host of evidence from the West. We find high degrees of risk tolerance, in agreement with the student comparisons finding higher risk tolerance in poorer countries. We also find risk tolerance to increase in income proxies, thus completing the paradox. We thereby use income proxies that can be considered as exogenous, allowing us to conclude that at least part of the causality must run from income to risk tolerance. We furthermore provide extensive methodological discussions on measuring and estimating risk preferences in development settings.
Subjects: 
risk preferences
development
experimental methodology
JEL: 
C93
D03
D80
O12
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.