Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/102390
Authors: 
Edler, Jakob
Berger, Martin
Dinges, Michael
Gök, Abdullah
Year of Publication: 
2011
Series/Report no.: 
Manchester Business School Working Paper 626
Abstract: 
This paper characterises and analyses evaluation practice in national innovation policy across Europe. It is the first study that examines and interprets the characteristics, quality, usefulness, and consequences of evaluations in a systematic way. The analysis is based on the comprehensive INNO-Appraisal repository of 171 evaluation reports of national innovation policies of EU25 countries, conducted between 2002 and 2007. The paper seeks (1) to assess the state of the art of evaluation in innovation policy at national level, (2) to understand how different key dimensions of evaluation (timing, purpose, methods, tendering process, etc.) relate to each other, and (3) to explore types of evaluations. On that basis, we (4) draw lessons as to what constitutes good practice in evaluation, as the results of the survey have been exchanged and discussed with a number of policy makers of the sample responsible for the evaluation. The paper thus both contributes to the academic understanding of policy evaluation and supports use in policy practice.
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
932.32 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.