Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/102065 
Autor:innen: 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2014
Schriftenreihe/Nr.: 
Memorandum No. 08/2014
Verlag: 
University of Oslo, Department of Economics, Oslo
Zusammenfassung: 
It is often argued that projects involving public good changes should be chosen on the basis of monetary valuation and cost-benefit analysis (CBA). In democratic project selection processes, however, decision-makers cannot generally interpret CBA as measuring projects' social welfare effects. The reason is partly that decision-makers' views of the good society differ - that is, they typically do not hold the same social welfare function - and partly because separating efficiency and distribution is even less straightforward in democratic than in dictatorial decision-making processes.
Schlagwörter: 
environmental cost-benefit analysis
ethics
democratic decision-making
JEL: 
A11
D31
D61
D63
D7
Dokumentart: 
Working Paper

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
449.53 kB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.