Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/100717 
Year of Publication: 
1999
Series/Report no.: 
Working Paper No. 99-8
Publisher: 
Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, Atlanta, GA
Abstract: 
The sign of the relationship between expected stock market returns and volatility appears to vary over time, a result that seems at odds with basic notions of risk and return. In this paper we construct an economy where production involves the use of both labor and capital as inputs. We show that when capital investment is "sticky," the sign of the relation between stock market risk and return varies in accordance with the supply of labor but requires no time variation in preferences. In particular, we show that for asset market equilibria where firms face an elastic supply of labor, the traditional positive risk-return relation obtains. Conversely, a negative relation obtains for asset market equilibria where there is positive probability that labor supply will be highly inelastic. A nice feature of our model is that, unlike earlier work, the sign of the stock market risk-return relation can be associated with observable features of the business cycle. Post–World War II macroeconomic and stock return data are used to test the predictions from the model. Using standard measures of stock market volatility, our results provide support for a stock market risk-return relation that is negative at the peaks of business cycles and positive at the troughs.
Subjects: 
Stock market
Risk
Production (Economic theory)
Business cycles
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
207.43 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.