Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/100158 
Authors: 
Year of Publication: 
2014
Series/Report no.: 
CeDEx Discussion Paper Series No. 2014-02
Publisher: 
The University of Nottingham, Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics (CeDEx), Nottingham
Abstract: 
This chapter presents some insights from basic behavioural research on the role of human pro-social motivation to maintain social order. I argue that social order can be conceptualised as a public good game. Past attempts to explain social order typically relied on the assumption of selfish and rational agents ("homo economicus"). The last twenty years of research in behavioural and experimental economics have challenged this view. After presenting the most important findings of recent research on human pro-sociality I discuss the evidence on three pillars of the maintenance of social order. The first pillar is internalised norms of cooperation, sustained by emotions such as guilt and shame. The second pillar is the behaviour of other people who typically are "conditional cooperators" willing to cooperate if others do so as well. This motivation can sustain cooperation if enough people cooperate but can jeopardise social order if many others follow selfish inclinations. The third pillar are sanctions meted out to anyone who does not cooperate; ideally punishment can work as a mere threat without being executed much. The chapter also presents some evidence on the cross-cultural variability of some findings, in particular with regard to punishment behaviour. The chapter concludes with remarks on future research.
Subjects: 
social order
social dilemma
pro-sociality
strong reciprocity
moral emotions
social norms
conditional cooperation
punishment
rule of law
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
882.35 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.