<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>EconStor Collection:</title>
    <link>https://hdl.handle.net/10419/316502</link>
    <description />
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 09:45:16 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:date>2026-05-01T09:45:16Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Analysis of Artificial Intelligence Exposure Across Industries in South Korea and the United States</title>
      <link>https://hdl.handle.net/10419/316639</link>
      <description>Title: Analysis of Artificial Intelligence Exposure Across Industries in South Korea and the United States
Authors: Baek, Yaein; Lee, Jiyun
Abstract: This study examines the impact of AI exposure on industries in South Korea and the United States from 2019 to 2022, using the AI Industry Exposure (AIIE) index developed by Felten et al. (2021). In South Korea, AI exposure is positively associated with employment but negatively associated with real labor income per capita, with labor productivity potentially driving the employment gains. Additionally, an analysis of occupational employment in South Korea confirms a positive correlation with AI exposure. For the U.S., AI exposure shows more pronounced labor market influence than in South Korea.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://hdl.handle.net/10419/316639</guid>
      <dc:date>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Drivers of Inflation in Korea: Insights from a Small Open DSGE Model</title>
      <link>https://hdl.handle.net/10419/316640</link>
      <description>Title: The Drivers of Inflation in Korea: Insights from a Small Open DSGE Model
Authors: Kim, Kyunghun
Abstract: This study analyzes the drivers of inflation in South Korea using a Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium (DSGE) model tailored to the characteristics of Korea as a small open economy. Employing quarterly data from 1999Q2 to 2023Q2, Bayesian estimation is used to estimate Korea-specific parameters. Based on the estimated parameters, impulse response analysis and historical decomposition are conducted. The results indicate that cost-push shocks tied to imported goods pricing have been the primary driver of recent inflation surges in Korea. Accordingly, policymakers need to adopt a comprehensive approach—including not only monetary policy but also macroprudential measures and raw material supply management—to mitigate supply-side inflationary pressures effectively.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://hdl.handle.net/10419/316640</guid>
      <dc:date>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Heterogeneous Effects of Trade Facilitation on Trade in Intermediate Goods: The Case of Korea, China, and Japan</title>
      <link>https://hdl.handle.net/10419/316641</link>
      <description>Title: The Heterogeneous Effects of Trade Facilitation on Trade in Intermediate Goods: The Case of Korea, China, and Japan
Authors: Yan, Tong; Jang, Yong Joon
Abstract: This paper empirically examines the impact of trade facilitation on the trade of intermediate goods in Korea, China, and Japan, along with their trading partner countries, during the period from 2008 to 2017. We particularly focus on the distinct roles of hard and soft environments in trade facilitation. Trade facilitation levels are quantified using principal component analysis, and regression analyses are conducted using the two-way fixed-effects model and the Arellano-Bond estimator. The regression results indicate that overall trade facilitation has the greatest positive impact on Korea's trade in intermediate goods. The hard environment significantly drives China's trade growth in intermediate goods, while the soft environment exerts the most substantial influence on Japan's trade growth in intermediate goods. These findings provide policy implications for regional cooperation and the enhancement of global value chains (GVCs) among Korea, China, and Japan.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://hdl.handle.net/10419/316641</guid>
      <dc:date>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Innovation and income inequality: Exploring the role of the Golden Triangle</title>
      <link>https://hdl.handle.net/10419/322262</link>
      <description>Title: Innovation and income inequality: Exploring the role of the Golden Triangle
Authors: Daliri, Hassan
Abstract: This study explores the complex relationship between innovation and income inequality in 29 Asian economies from 2013 to 2022, emphasizing the mediating role of the Golden Triangle-comprising the state, civil society, and the market system. The study highlights how imbalances in the Golden Triangle's components can hinder the inclusive potential of innovation, exacerbating inequality. Using a Panel Smooth Transition Regression (PSTR) model, it captures the nonlinear dynamics of innovation's impact on income distribution and identifies threshold effects driven by institutional imbalances. The study reveals that the impact of innovation on income inequality is highly dependent on the balance within the Golden Triangle-state, civil society, and the market. When this balance is maintained, innovation contributes to more equitable income distribution by fostering inclusive economic growth. However, when the Golden Triangle is imbalanced, innovation disproportionately benefits higher-income groups, widening income disparities. Specifically, excessive power imbalances reduce the income share of low-income groups and concentrate wealth among high-income groups. Power imbalances weaken the redistributive effects of innovation, reducing the income share of lower-income groups while concentrating wealth at the top. These results highlight the critical role of institutional frameworks in shaping the equity outcomes of innovation. The study offers valuable policy insights, emphasizing the need for balanced institutional structures to ensure that innovation promotes inclusive growth rather than deepening economic disparities in Asian economies.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://hdl.handle.net/10419/322262</guid>
      <dc:date>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

