<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel rdf:about="https://hdl.handle.net/10419/234435">
    <title>EconStor Collection:</title>
    <link>https://hdl.handle.net/10419/234435</link>
    <description />
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://hdl.handle.net/10419/315740" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://hdl.handle.net/10419/315739" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://hdl.handle.net/10419/323221" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://hdl.handle.net/10419/316449" />
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <dc:date>2026-05-01T03:55:15Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
  <item rdf:about="https://hdl.handle.net/10419/315740">
    <title>Antisemitism and pro-Palestine protests at German universities: Survey results among students and university rectorates</title>
    <link>https://hdl.handle.net/10419/315740</link>
    <description>Title: Antisemitism and pro-Palestine protests at German universities: Survey results among students and university rectorates
Authors: Hinz, Thomas; Marczuk, Anna; Multrus, Frank
Abstract: In Germany, pro-Palestine protests in the form of camps and institute occupations have occurred and continue to take place at universities. Antisemitic incidents have been reported at many of these protests. Following the initial data collection in December 2023, this report provides a new, focused, up-to-date assessment of the opinion climate in the context of the Middle East conflict and antisemitic attitudes at German universities. Exactly one year after the first report, the results of two recent surveys by the Higher Education Research Unit (AG Hochschulforschung) are summarized here. First, based on a large online survey conducted in December 2024 with over 1,800 students, we report on these students' assessments of the conflict and antisemitic tendencies among them. This follows on directly from the previous study mentioned earlier (Hinz et al., 2024), enabling us to describe possible changes compared to last year. In some places, we also examine the assessments and attitudes of students compared to a sample from the general population. Second, we present the results of a simultaneous survey of university rectorates on antisemitic incidents and the universities' reactions to these incidents. At the invitation of the German Rectors' Conference (HRK), a total of 94 university management teams took part in this separate online survey. The results indicate that universities have been strongly affected by antisemitic incidents and that antisemitic resentment remains at a constant level. A high level of vigilance is still required, particularly with regards to Israel-related antisemitism.</description>
    <dc:date>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="https://hdl.handle.net/10419/315739">
    <title>Antisemitismus und pro-palästinensische Proteste an deutschen Hochschulen: Befragungsergebnisse bei Studierenden und Hochschulleitungen</title>
    <link>https://hdl.handle.net/10419/315739</link>
    <description>Title: Antisemitismus und pro-palästinensische Proteste an deutschen Hochschulen: Befragungsergebnisse bei Studierenden und Hochschulleitungen
Authors: Hinz, Thomas; Marczuk, Anna; Multrus, Frank
Abstract: In Deutschland kam und kommt es an Hochschulen auch zu pro-palästinensischen Protesten in Form von Camps und Institutsbesetzungen. Bei vielen der Protestaktionen wurden antisemitische Vorfälle registriert. Der vorliegende Bericht liefert nach einer ersten Datenerhebung im Dezember 2023 eine erneute, fokussierte und aktuelle Bestandsaufnahme zum Meinungsklima im Kontext des Nahostkonflikts und zu antisemitischen Haltungen an deutschen Hochschulen. Genau ein Jahr nach dem ersten Bericht werden die Ergebnisse von zwei aktuellen Befragungen der AG Hochschulforschung zusammengefasst: Erstens berichten wir auf der Grundlage einer großen Onlinebefragung aus dem Dezember 2024 mit über 1.800 Studierenden über ihre Einschätzungen zum Konflikt und über antisemitische Tendenzen unter ihnen. Damit schließen wir direkt an die erwähnte Vorläuferstudie an (Hinz et al., 2024) und können mögliche Veränderungen im Vergleich zum letzten Jahr beschreiben. Dabei blicken wir an einigen Stellen auch auf die Einschätzungen und Haltungen der Studierenden im Vergleich zu einer Stichprobe aus der allgemeinen Bevölkerung. Zweitens stellen wir die Ergebnisse einer zeitgleichen Befragung von Hochschulleitungen zu antisemitischen Vorfällen und den Reaktionen der Hochschulen darauf dar. An dieser separaten Onlinebefragung nahmen insgesamt 94 Hochschulleitungen teil, die von der Hochschulrektorenkonferenz (HRK) eingeladen wurden. Die Ergebnisse belegen eine starke Betroffenheit von Hochschulen durch antisemitische Vorfälle. Die gemessenen antisemitischen Ressentiments sind auf konstantem Niveau. Es ist weiterhin hohe Wachsamkeit angezeigt - insbesondere gegenüber israelbezogenem Antisemitismus.</description>
    <dc:date>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="https://hdl.handle.net/10419/323221">
    <title>Fairness and support for redistribution: The role of preferences and beliefs</title>
    <link>https://hdl.handle.net/10419/323221</link>
    <description>Title: Fairness and support for redistribution: The role of preferences and beliefs
Authors: Harrs, Sören; Sterba, Maj-Britt
Abstract: This paper establishes three novel findings on fairness and redistribution by combining theory-driven experimental games with large-scale surveys in the U.S. and five European countries. First, individuals revealing egalitarian, libertarian, or meritocratic fairness preferences in experimental games show large differences in support for tax and transfer policies. Second, beliefs in merit strongly predict policy support among meritocrats, but are less predictive among non-meritocrats. Third, fairness concerns matter across income groups and political camps. Our findings challenge the assumptions that meritocratic preferences are homogeneous, that fairness is a luxury good, and that fairness is mainly a moral foundation of left voters.</description>
    <dc:date>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="https://hdl.handle.net/10419/316449">
    <title>Unequal pay, fairness perceptions, and work effort: Experimental evidence from China</title>
    <link>https://hdl.handle.net/10419/316449</link>
    <description>Title: Unequal pay, fairness perceptions, and work effort: Experimental evidence from China
Authors: Galchenko, Valeria; Zubanov, Nick; Wong, Ho Lun; Zhou, Xiang
Abstract: In a field experiment in China, we informed randomly selected workers that others received a higher wage for the same work. Compared to the uninformed but equally paid workers, the informed perceived their pay as less fair, but, surprisingly, increased their output without reducing quality. Although we did not communicate reasons for the pay difference, a post-experiment survey revealed that workers developed their own, predominantly benign, explanations, the leading one being higher quality of the better-paid workers. We validated our experimental results with a follow-up survey of 1100 people of working age in China whom we briefed about our findings and asked for their explanations. 57% believed that the informed workers perceived their higher-paid peers to be better workers and aspired to match them. When asked what they would do in a similar situation, 75% replied that they would work harder as well. Our results hint at the importance of culture in moderating behavioral responses to unequal pay, not all of them necessarily negative.</description>
    <dc:date>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
</rdf:RDF>

