<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>EconStor Collection:</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="https://hdl.handle.net/10419/90433" />
  <subtitle />
  <id>https://hdl.handle.net/10419/90433</id>
  <updated>2026-04-28T10:15:30Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2026-04-28T10:15:30Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>Europäische und zivilgesellschaftliche Hintergründe der euro(pa)skeptischen Partei Alternative für Deutschland (AfD)</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://hdl.handle.net/10419/104064" />
    <author>
      <name>Plehwe, Dieter</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>Schlögl, Matthias</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://hdl.handle.net/10419/104064</id>
    <updated>2023-12-05T02:29:03Z</updated>
    <published>2014-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Europäische und zivilgesellschaftliche Hintergründe der euro(pa)skeptischen Partei Alternative für Deutschland (AfD)
Authors: Plehwe, Dieter; Schlögl, Matthias
Abstract: Die Gründung und rasche Mitgliederentwicklung der euro(pa)skeptischen Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) im Jahr 2013 steht im Einklang mit Erfolgen rechtspopulistischer Parteien in anderen EU Mitgliedsländern. Seit der Ablehnung des Verfassungsvertrages bei Volksabstimmungen in Frankreich und der Niederlande gilt der "permissive Konsens" bezüglich Kernfragen der Europäischen Einigung auch im Kreise der EG-Gründungsmitglieder als bedroht. Gegner einer fortschreitenden Vertiefung der Europäischen Integration, nicht zuletzt die britischen Tories unter Premier David Cameron, rechnen sich vermehrt Aussichten auf eine erfolgreiche Neuausrichtung der europäischen Politik aus. Diese europäischen und die weiteren zivilgesellschaftlichen Hintergründe der konservativ-neoliberal ausgerichteten Partei in Deutschland sind maßgebliche Faktoren für die Erklärung des schnellen Aufstiegs und die Einordnung der Alternative für Deutschland ins deutsche und europäische Parteienspektrum. Das Papier untersucht in diesem Zusammenhang zum einen die Herausbildung der europäischen politischen Partei Alliance of European Conservatives and Reformists (AECR) auf der Basis der Prager Erklärung, die AECR Parteistiftung New Directions und deren europäisches Partner-Netzwerk genauer. Zum anderen werden die neoliberal-europakritischen Hintergründe der AfD anhand einer Reihe von zivilgesellschaftlichen Organisationen, Think Tanks, Vorläuferparteien und Initiativen dargestellt.</summary>
    <dc:date>2014-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Converging on strike revisited: Deregulation and the rise of low cost employment regimes in the European airline industry</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://hdl.handle.net/10419/90435" />
    <author>
      <name>Plehwe, Dieter</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://hdl.handle.net/10419/90435</id>
    <updated>2023-11-10T02:06:14Z</updated>
    <published>2013-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Converging on strike revisited: Deregulation and the rise of low cost employment regimes in the European airline industry
Authors: Plehwe, Dieter
Abstract: Airline industry restructuring proceeded in high gear following the 9/11 attacks, which triggered a global air transport crisis in the beginning of the new millennium. European (network) legacy carriers have been reorganizing to meet low-cost challengers in European and new competition in global markets. The focus on employment relations and cost-oriented human resource management (HRM) has already been discussed back in the 1990s, pitching industry-level convergence arguments against diversity accounts on the one hand, and featuring different understandings and methodologies of comparative industrial relations (IR) on the other hand. A final comment to a controversy in the European Journal of Industrial Relations of 15 years ago pointed to the neglected dimension of increasing tensions and labor conflicts in the earlier debate, and thereby addressed an important commonality in the European industry's development during the late 1980s and early 1990s. This article revisits the debate to eventually treat the argument of convergence on strike as a set of hypotheses to be tested for the time after 1995. Apart from overall confirming the pattern of a high propensity to labor conflict in the airline industry I concur with Gall (1996) that the causes for relatively high levels of conflict can change over time. A better understanding of the reasons for the latest convergence on strike (2000s) is therefore considered the next frontier with evidence suggesting an overall growing segment of low-cost employment relations to explain the most recent waves of labor conflict and the cross national variation of employment relations in the industry.</summary>
    <dc:date>2013-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Crisis management and the varieties of capitalism: Fiscal stimulus packages and the transformation of East Asian state-led capitalism since 2008</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://hdl.handle.net/10419/90434" />
    <author>
      <name>Kalinowski, Thomas</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://hdl.handle.net/10419/90434</id>
    <updated>2023-11-20T02:51:05Z</updated>
    <published>2013-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Crisis management and the varieties of capitalism: Fiscal stimulus packages and the transformation of East Asian state-led capitalism since 2008
Authors: Kalinowski, Thomas
Abstract: This paper contributes to the understanding of the diversity of capitalism by combining approaches from comparative political economy and development studies, notably developmental state theory. We show that different types of capitalism react differently to global shocks and offer some support for the classic varieties of capitalism argument that external pressure leads to the reinforcement of historically evolved institutions. Moreover, we make several departures from established theories on the variety of capitalism, namely, their Eurocentric bias, their under-theorization of the role of the state, and the methodological conservative bias of institutionalist approaches. At the empirical level, this paper studies the reaction of East Asian countries (China, Japan and Korea) to the global financial crisis with a focus on fiscal stimulus packages that were implemented from 2008 to 2010. Unlike in the West, where a (short-lived) revival of Keynesianism could be observed, East Asian governments implemented large fiscal stimulus packages with strong elements of industrial policies. This paper argues that the size and character of fiscal stimulus packages can be explained by a path dependency of developmental state capitalism. In addition, the paper examines the substantial changes in the transformation from an old-style developmental state to a neo-developmental state.</summary>
    <dc:date>2013-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>

