<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>EconStor Community:</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="https://hdl.handle.net/10419/182294" />
  <subtitle />
  <id>https://hdl.handle.net/10419/182294</id>
  <updated>2026-05-02T16:13:03Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2026-05-02T16:13:03Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>Protest and Parternship: Case Studies of Indigenous Peoples, Consultation and Engagement, and Resource Development in Canada</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://hdl.handle.net/10419/305371" />
    <author>
      <name />
    </author>
    <id>https://hdl.handle.net/10419/305371</id>
    <updated>2024-11-09T02:12:01Z</updated>
    <published>2024-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Protest and Parternship: Case Studies of Indigenous Peoples, Consultation and Engagement, and Resource Development in Canada
Editors: Winter, Jennifer; Boyd, Brendan
Abstract: The development of equitable relationships and outcomes among Indigenous communities, resource development companies, and governments in Canada is slow and uneven. Protest and Partnership brings together expert contributors to ask what works—and what doesn't—in these relationships. It explores what processes lead to greater involvement and control in decision-making by Indigenous Peoples and the establishment of mutually beneficial partnerships. Protest and Partnership presents case studies on a range of resource development sectors including oil and gas, renewable energy, mining, and forestry, drawn from regions across Canada. It presents a fine-grained analysis of institutions and processes, demonstrating how Indigenous communities work within and outside frameworks and processes established by governments and industry. It recognizes the persistent failure of Canadian governments to honour treaty rights and provide meaningful consultation and demonstrates how Indigenous groups, communities, and governments have engaged in self-determined resource development despite these ongoing failures. Offering broad lessons in the importance of co-management and co-governance, the autonomy of Indigenous Peoples, transparency and accountability, Indigenous economic security, and meaningful collaboration and engagement, Protest and Partnership is a thorough and careful exploration of the current state of consultation and engagement on resource development with Indigenous communities in Canada.</summary>
    <dc:date>2024-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Imperial standard: Imperial Oil, Exxon, and the Canadian oil industry from 1880</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://hdl.handle.net/10419/200720" />
    <author>
      <name>Taylor, Graham D.</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://hdl.handle.net/10419/200720</id>
    <updated>2024-09-16T14:22:49Z</updated>
    <published>2019-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Imperial standard: Imperial Oil, Exxon, and the Canadian oil industry from 1880
Authors: Taylor, Graham D.
Abstract: For over 130 years, Imperial Oil dominated Canada's oil industry. From Petrolia to Turner Valley, Imperial was always nearby and ready to take charge. Their 1947 discovery of crude oil in Leduc, Alberta transformed the industry and the country. But from 1899 onwards, two-thirds of the company was owned by an American giant, making Imperial Oil one of the largest foreign-controlled multinationals in Canada. "Imperial Standard" is the first full-scale history of Imperial Oil. It illuminates Imperial's longstanding connections to Standard Oil of New Jersey, also known as Exxon Mobil. Although this relationship was often beneficial to Imperial, allowing them access to technology and capital, it also came at a cost. During the energy crises of the 1970s and 80s, Imperial was assailed as the embodiment of foreign control of Canada's natural resources, and in the 1990s it followed Exxon's lead in resisting charges that the oil industry contributes to climate change. Graham D. Taylor draws on an extensive collection of primary sources, including both the Imperial Oil and Exxon Mobil archives, to explore the complex relationship between the two companies. This groundbreaking history provides unprecedented insight into one of Canada's most influential oil companies as well as the industry itself.</summary>
    <dc:date>2019-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>China's Arctic ambitions and what they mean for Canada</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://hdl.handle.net/10419/200718" />
    <author>
      <name>Lackenbauer, P. Whitney</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>Lajeunesse, Adam</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>Manicom, James</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>Lasserre, Frédéric</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://hdl.handle.net/10419/200718</id>
    <updated>2023-12-25T03:02:37Z</updated>
    <published>2018-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: China's Arctic ambitions and what they mean for Canada
Authors: Lackenbauer, P. Whitney; Lajeunesse, Adam; Manicom, James; Lasserre, Frédéric
Abstract: Canada is the one of the first in-depth studies of China's increasing interest in the Arctic. It offers a holistic approach to understanding Chinese motivations and the potential impacts of greater Chinese presence in the circumpolar region, exploring resource development, shipping, scientific research, governance, and security. Drawing on extensive research in Chinese government documentation, business and media reports, and current academic literature, this timely volume eschews the common assumption that China poses an acute threat to Arctic states' polar interests. Instead, it offers a nuanced assessment of how different Chinese stakeholders approach the region and how carefully managed relationships can contribute to positive circumpolar development. Analyzing Chinese interests and activities from a Canadian perspective, the book provides an unparalleled point of reference to discuss the implications for the Canadian and broader circumpolar North.</summary>
    <dc:date>2018-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Neighbours and networks: The blood tribe in the Southern Alberta economy, 1884-1939</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://hdl.handle.net/10419/182296" />
    <author>
      <name>Regular, W. Keith</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://hdl.handle.net/10419/182296</id>
    <updated>2024-09-16T14:24:05Z</updated>
    <published>2009-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Neighbours and networks: The blood tribe in the Southern Alberta economy, 1884-1939
Authors: Regular, W. Keith
Abstract: Neighbours and Networks explores the economic relationship that existed between the Blood Indian reserve and the surrounding region of southern Alberta between 1884 and 1939. The Blood tribe, though living on a reserve, refused to become economically isolated from the larger community and indeed became significant contributors to the economy of the area. Their land base was important to the ranching industry. Their products, especially coal and hay, were sought after by settlers, and the Bloods were encouraged not only to provide them as needed, but also to become expert freighters, transporting goods from the reserve for non-Native business people. Blood field labour in the Raymond area's sugar beet fields was at times critical to the functioning of that industry. In addition, the Bloods' ties to the merchant community, especially in Cardston and Fort Macleod, resulted in a significant infusion of money into the local economy. Keith Regular's study fills the gap left by Canadian historiography that has largely ignored the economic associations between Natives and non-Natives living in a common environment. His microhistory refutes the perception that Native reserves have played only a minor role in regional development, and provides an excellent example of a cross-cultural, co-operative economic relationship in the post-treaty period on the Canadian plains.</summary>
    <dc:date>2009-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>

