Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/86435 
Year of Publication: 
2006
Series/Report no.: 
Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper No. 06-078/4
Publisher: 
Tinbergen Institute, Amsterdam and Rotterdam
Abstract: 
In practice structural equations are often estimated by least-squares, thus neglecting any simultaneity. This paper reveals why this may often be justifiable and when. Assuming data stationarity and existence of the first four moments of the disturbances we find the limiting distribution of the ordinary least-squares (OLS) estimator in a linear simultaneous equations model. In simple static and dynamic models we compare the asymptotic efficiency of this inconsistent estimator with that of consistent simple instrumental variable (IV) estimators and depict cases where -- due to relative weakness of the instruments or mildness of the simultaneity -- the inconsistent estimator is more precise. In addition, we examine by simulation to what extent these first-order asymptotic findings are reflected in finite sample, taking into account non-existence of moments of the IV estimator. By dynamic visualization techniques we enable to appreciate any differences in efficiency over a parameter space of a much higher dimension than just two, viz. in colored animated image sequences (which are not very effective in print, but much more so in live-on-screen projection).
Subjects: 
invalid instruments
simultaneity bias
weak instruments
4D diagrams
due to relative weakness of the instruments or mildness of the simultaneity
JEL: 
C13
C15
C30
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
590.54 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.