Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/84866 
Autor:innen: 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2011
Schriftenreihe/Nr.: 
Darmstadt Discussion Papers in Economics No. 208
Verlag: 
Technische Universität Darmstadt, Department of Law and Economics, Darmstadt
Zusammenfassung: 
In the wake of the financial crisis of 2007-8 academic as well as non-academic interest in the economic thought of John Maynard Keynes was revived. The notion of a 'liquidity trap', interpreted as a zero bound of the (short-term) nominal rate of interest, is seen as one of Keynes's important and lasting contributions to economic theory and to the understanding of the potential problems of monetary policy.2 This view of the alleged connection between Keynes, the 'liquidity trap' and the zero bound of the rate of interest is especially prominent in the macroeconomic textbook of Olivier J. Blanchard (2009).3 Unfortunately, the account given there of a supposed connection between Keynes's analysis in his General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money and the zero bound of the rate of interest proves to be unsustainable. In what follows, it will be shown that Keynes did not invent the term 'liquidity trap', that he discussed an effective floor to the (long-term) rate of interest at a positive level and that the zero bound of the (short-term) rate of interest was well known to British economists before the publication of Keynes's General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money.
Dokumentart: 
Working Paper

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
149.34 kB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.