Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/64194 
Autor:innen: 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2010
Schriftenreihe/Nr.: 
Working Paper No. 2010-08
Verlag: 
University of Massachusetts, Department of Economics, Amherst, MA
Zusammenfassung: 
Structuralist and post Keynesian models differ in their assumptions about firms' investment behavior and pricing/output decisions. This paper compares three benchmark models: Kaleckian, Robinsonian and Kaldorian. We analyze the implications of these models for the steady growth path and the cyclical properties of the economy, and evaluate the consistency of the theoretical predictions with empirical evidence for the US. Our regression results and the stylized cyclical pattern of key variables are consistent with the Kaldorian model. The Kaleckian investment function and the Robinsonian pricing behavior find no support in the data.
Schlagwörter: 
growth
business cycles
aggregate demand
instability
income distribution
utilization rate
investment function
pricing
JEL: 
E12
E32
O41
Dokumentart: 
Working Paper

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
1.48 MB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.