EconStor >
Brown University >
Department of Economics, Brown University >
Working Papers, Department of Economics, Brown University >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10419/62669
  
Title:Premise-based versus outcome-based information aggregation PDF Logo
Authors:de Clippel, Geoffroy
Eliaz, Kfir
Issue Date:2012
Series/Report no.:Working Paper, Brown University, Department of Economics 2012-10
Abstract:A group of rational individuals with common interest need to select one of two outcomes. The optimal decision depends on whether certain premises or pieces of evidence are established as being true, and each member receives a noisy signal of the truth value of the relevant premises. Should the group reach a decision by voting whether each premise is true or false, or should they simply vote on the outcome? We show that for any finite number of individuals, the premise-based voting rule is more efficient in aggregating information than the outcome-based rule. However, generically, the gain from using the premise-based over the outcome-based rule can only be marginal when numerous individuals express independent opinions. Indeed, the outcome-based game is almost always asymptotically efficient.
Document Type:Working Paper
Appears in Collections:Working Papers, Department of Economics, Brown University

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
723936358.pdf296.87 kBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX
Share on:http://hdl.handle.net/10419/62669

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.