Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/62459 
Year of Publication: 
2012
Series/Report no.: 
IZA Discussion Papers No. 6747
Publisher: 
Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn
Abstract: 
The adoption of performance related pay schemes has become increasingly popular in the public sector of several countries. In the UK, the scheme designers favoured collective performance pay with the aim to foster cooperation across offices. The resulting team structure included several offices (subteams) within the same team, defined by the remuneration scheme. In this paper we analyse the strategic interactions across subteams created by a two-level team structure, in order to assess whether rewarding collective performance necessarily promotes cooperation. We show that such team structure creates conflicting incentives to free-ride across and within subteams. Moreover, the relative size of subteams can be a powerful means to deliver incentives when funds for performance rewards are limited. Using data for one of the incentive schemes piloted in the UK, we analyse the role of the target level and of the relative size of subteams on subteams' performance.
Subjects: 
incentives
teams performance
sub-teams
cooperation
JEL: 
M52
M54
J33
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
255.74 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.