Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/59206 
Year of Publication: 
2008
Series/Report no.: 
Public Policy Discussion Papers No. 09-1
Publisher: 
Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, Boston, MA
Abstract: 
This paper explores the question of whether market participants could have or should have anticipated the large increase in foreclosures that occurred in 2007 and 2008. Most of these foreclosures stem from loans originated in 2005 and 2006, leading many to suspect that lenders originated a large volume of extremely risky loans during this period. However, the authors show that while loans originated in this period did carry extra risk factors, particularly increased leverage, underwriting standards alone cannot explain the dramatic rise in foreclosures. Focusing on the role of house prices, the authors ask whether market participants underestimated the likelihood of a fall in house prices or the sensitivity of foreclosures to house prices. The authors show that, given available data, market participants should have been able to understand that a significant fall in prices would cause a large increase in foreclosures, although loan]level (as opposed to ownership]level) models would have predicted a smaller rise than actually occurred. Examining analyst reports and other contemporary discussions of the mortgage market to see what market participants thought would happen, the authors find that analysts, on the whole, understood that a fall in prices would have disastrous consequences for the market but assigned a low probability to such an outcome.
JEL: 
D11
D12
G21
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
487.34 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.