Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/59036
Authors: 
Dietz, Simon
Year of Publication: 
2012
Citation: 
[Journal:] Economics: The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal [Volume:] 6 [Issue:] 2012-18 [Pages:] 1-12
Abstract: 
This note considers the treatment of risk and uncertainty in the recently established social cost of carbon (SCC) for analysis of federal regulations in the United States. It argues that the analysis of the US Interagency Working Group on Social Cost of Carbon did not go far enough into the tail of low-probability, high-impact scenarios, and, via its approach to discounting, it mis-estimated climate risk, possibly hugely. Given the uncertainty about estimating the SCC, the note concludes by arguing that there is in fact much to commend an approach whereby a quantitative, long-term emissions target is chosen, and the price of carbon for regulatory impact analysis is then based on estimates of the marginal cost of abatement to achieve that very target.
Subjects: 
ambiguity
climate change
discounting
integrated assessment modelling
risk
social cost of carbon
uncertainty
JEL: 
Q54
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Creative Commons License: 
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/de/deed.en
Document Type: 
Article

Files in This Item:
File
Size
200.78 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.