Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/53375 
Autor:innen: 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2011
Schriftenreihe/Nr.: 
Nota di Lavoro No. 24.2011
Verlag: 
Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM), Milano
Zusammenfassung: 
The aim of the paper is to present evidence that China and India are, and will remain, two very different actors in international negotiations to control global warming. We base our conclusions on historical data and on scenarios until 2050. The Business-as-Usual scenario (BaU) is compared to four Emissions Tax scenarios to draw insights on major transformations in energy use and in energy supply and to assess the possible contribution of China and India to a future international climate architecture. We study whether or not the Copenhagen intensity targets require more action than the BaU scenario and we assess whether the emissions reductions induced by the four tax scenarios are compatible with the G8 and MEF pledge to reduce global emissions by 50% in 2050.
Schlagwörter: 
Climate Change
China
India
Energy Efficiency
Energy and Development
JEL: 
Q32
Q43
Q54
Q43
O53
P52
Dokumentart: 
Working Paper

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
265.08 kB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.