Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/49662 
Year of Publication: 
2010
Series/Report no.: 
CeDEx Discussion Paper Series No. 2010-16
Publisher: 
The University of Nottingham, Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics (CeDEx), Nottingham
Abstract: 
Psychological game theory can provide rational-choice-based framing effects; frames influence beliefs, beliefs influence motivations. We explain this theoretically and explore empirical relevance experimentally. In a 2×2 design of one-shot public good games we show that frames affect subject's first- and second-order beliefs, and contributions. From a psychological gametheoretic framework we derive two mutually compatible hypotheses about guilt aversion and reciprocity under which contributions are related to second- and first-order beliefs, respectively. Our results are consistent with either.
Subjects: 
framing
psychological game theory
guilt aversion
reciprocity
public good games
voluntary cooperation
JEL: 
C91
C72
D64
Z13
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
842.82 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.