Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/45773 
Kompletter Metadatensatz
DublinCore-FeldWertSprache
dc.contributor.authorForslund, Andersen
dc.contributor.authorFredriksson, Peteren
dc.contributor.authorVikström, Johanen
dc.date.accessioned2011-02-17-
dc.date.accessioned2011-05-27T09:30:14Z-
dc.date.available2011-05-27T09:30:14Z-
dc.date.issued2011-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/45773-
dc.description.abstractThis paper discusses the case for expanding active labor market policy in recession. We find that there is reasonable case for relying more heavily on certain kinds of programs. The argument is tied to the varying size of the lock-in effect in boom and recession. If programs with relatively large lock-in effects should ever be used, they should be used in a downturn. The reason is simply that the cost of forgoing search time is lower in recession. We also provide new evidence on the relative effectiveness of different kinds of programs over the business cycle. In particular we compare an on-the-job training scheme with (traditional) labor market training. We find that labor market training is relatively more effective in recession. This result is consistent with our priors since labor market training features relative large lock-in effects.en
dc.language.isoengen
dc.publisher|aInstitute for Labour Market Policy Evaluation (IFAU) |cUppsalaen
dc.relation.ispartofseries|aWorking Paper |x2011:2en
dc.subject.jelJ08en
dc.subject.jelJ64en
dc.subject.jelJ68en
dc.subject.ddc330en
dc.subject.keywordActive labor market policyen
dc.subject.keywordbusiness cycleen
dc.subject.keywordunemploymenten
dc.titleWhat active labor market policy works in a recession?-
dc.typeWorking Paperen
dc.identifier.ppn646497871en
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
345.59 kB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.