Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/44615 
Kompletter Metadatensatz
DublinCore-FeldWertSprache
dc.contributor.authorMandøe Glæsner, Nielsen
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-16-
dc.date.accessioned2011-04-08T09:05:29Z-
dc.date.available2011-04-08T09:05:29Z-
dc.date.issued2010-
dc.identifier.isbn978-87-7605-368-0en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/44615-
dc.description.abstractThis study takes off by demonstrating how the ability of the state to define the difference between ordinary crime and terrorism, both historically and conceptually, is rootet in an immanent power reserve, which the sovereign state carries within from its founding. The paper links this power reserve, ultimately based on violence in the state of emergency, with the juridical language of the sovereign state. After drawing up this theoretical framework for the state's monopoly of the legal definition - based foremost on the thoughts of Carl Schmitt and Walter Benjamin - the paper thoroughly maps the legal anti terrorism measures taken in UK and Denmark. Through this study it is shown how to understand the unspecific language used in the anti terror laws, of a way of managing the state's monopoly of definition in the light of the threat of terrorism.en
dc.language.isodanen
dc.publisher|aDanish Institute for International Studies (DIIS) |cCopenhagenen
dc.relation.ispartofseries|aDIIS Working Paper |x2010:01en
dc.subject.ddc330en
dc.subject.stwStaatstheorieen
dc.subject.stwPolitische Gewalten
dc.subject.stwNationale Sicherheiten
dc.subject.stwInnere Sicherheiten
dc.subject.stwDänemarken
dc.titleRetsstat, magtstat og suverænstat: Terrorlovgivninger i perspektiv-
dc.typeWorking Paperen
dc.identifier.ppn617771456en
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
293.24 kB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.