EconStor >
Georg-August-Universität Göttingen >
cege - Centrum für Europa-, Governance- und Entwicklungsforschung, Universität Göttingen >
cege-Diskussionspapiere, Universität Göttingen >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10419/41578
  
Title:Perceived job insecurity and well-being revisited: Towards conceptual clarity PDF Logo
Authors:Geishecker, Ingo
Issue Date:2009
Series/Report no.:Discussion papers // CeGE 90
Abstract:This paper analyzes the impact of job insecurity perceptions on individual well-being. While previous studies on the subject have used the concept of perceived job insecurity rather arbitrarily, the present analysis explicitly takes into account individual perceptions about both the likelihood and the potential costs of job loss. We demonstrate that any model assessing the impact of perceived job insecurity on individual well-being potentially suffers from simultaneity bias yielding upward-biased coefficients. When applying our concept of perceived job insecurity to concrete data from a large household panel survey we find the true unbiased effects of perceived job insecurity to be more than twice the size of estimates that ignore simultaneity. Accordingly, perceived job insecurity ranks as one of the most important factors in employee well-being and paradoxically can be even more harmful than actual job loss with subsequent unemployment.
Subjects:job security
life satisfaction
unemployment
JEL:D84
J63
Z13
Document Type:Working Paper
Appears in Collections:cege-Diskussionspapiere, Universität Göttingen

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
614464528.pdf360.51 kBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX
Share on:http://hdl.handle.net/10419/41578

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.