Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/38995
Authors: 
Amoroso, Sara
Kort, Peter M.
Melenberg, Bertrand
Plasmans, Joseph
Vancauteren, Mark
Year of Publication: 
2010
Series/Report no.: 
CESifo working paper Industrial Organisation 3082
Abstract: 
This article examines the role of the interaction between product market and labor market imperfections in determining total factor productivity growth (TFPG). Embedding Dobbelaere and Mairesse's (2009) generalization of Hall's (1990) approach, allowing for the possibility that wages are determined according to an efficient bargaining process between employers and employees, we correct estimated TFPG for possible biases arising from labor market imperfections. Our analysis contributes to the literature in a number of ways. First, we propose a new empirical measure of TFPG which takes into account possible biases coming from imperfect competition on both labor and output markets, whereas Dobbelaere and Mairesse (2009) focus on the decomposition of the Solow residual. Second, in contrast to most of the literature following Hall's approach, we estimate market power including the user cost of capital stock. Third, we measure the sensitivity of TFPG to an alternative specification of competition based on relative profits. Using a large Dutch firm-level panel database over the period 1989-2005, we find that workers' unions power, and in general rigidities of the labor market, affect firms' marginal cost, and, consequently, the markups. Moreover, taking into account variable returns to scale and imperfect competition in the output market translate into increased TFPG, while accounting for labor market bargaining power leads to lower TFPG. Next, the investigation of our empirical relationship between the price-cost margin and an alternative specification of imperfect competition of the output market (profit elasticity) as a sensitivity analysis of the TFPG shows that adding more structure to the competition measure does not affect the level of productivity change.
JEL: 
D21
D24
L00
L13
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
332.28 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.