Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/35173 
Year of Publication: 
2008
Series/Report no.: 
IZA Discussion Papers No. 3275
Publisher: 
Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn
Abstract: 
In this paper we experimentally test whether competing for a desired reward does not only affect individuals' performance, but also their tendency to cheat. Recent doping scandals in sports as well as forgery and plagiarism scandals in academia have been partially explained by competitive pressures, which suggests a link between competition and cheating. In our experiment subjects conduct a task where they have the possibility to make use of illegitimate tools to better their results. We find that women react much stronger to competitive pressure by increasing their cheating activity while there is no overall sex difference in cheating. However, the effect of competition on women's cheating behavior is entirely due to the fact that women, on average, are doing worse with respect to the assigned task. Indeed we find that it is the ability of an individual to conduct a particular task and not sex that crucially affects the reaction to competition. Poor performers significantly increase their cheating behavior under competition which may be a face-saving strategy or an attempt to retain a chance of winning.
Subjects: 
Competition
tournament
piece rate
cheating
experiment
JEL: 
C91
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
446.97 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.