Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/34907
Authors: 
Sala, Héctor
Silva, José Ignacio
Toledo, Manuel E.
Year of Publication: 
2008
Series/Report no.: 
IZA Discussion Papers 3293
Abstract: 
We study whether segmented labor markets with flexibility at the margin (e.g., just affecting fixed-term employees) can achieve similar volatility than fully deregulated labor markets. Flexibility at the margin produces a gap in separation costs among matched workers that cause fixed-term employment to be the main workforce adjustment device, which in turn increases de labor market volatility. This increased volatility is partially reverted when limitations in the duration and number of renewals of fixed-term contracts are introduced. Under this scenario, firms respond by reducing the intensity of job destruction since it becomes more difficult to avoid firing costs in permanents contracts. We present a matching model with temporary and permanent jobs where (i) the gap in firing costs and (ii) restrictions in the use of fixed-term contracts helps explain the similar volatility observed in many regulated OECD labor markets with flexibility at the margin vis-à-vis the fully deregulated ones.
Subjects: 
Flexibility at the margin
volatility
separation costs
matching model
JEL: 
J23
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
265.65 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.